When More Work Makes Things Worse
Many teams respond to poor outcomes by increasing execution.
Shelf life is short → reformulate. Margins are tight → cut costs.
Sales slow → increase marketing.
Activity increases.
Effort intensifies.
Outcomes deteriorate.
This is not a failure of execution.
It is execution applied to the wrong problem — a failure of judgment.
Execution, Decision, and Judgment Are Not the Same Thing
Execution, decision, and judgment are often treated as interchangeable.
They are not.
- Execution answers: What do we do next?
- Decision answers: What are we committing to?
- Judgment answers: What is actually constraining success?
Execution performs work.
Decisions lock direction.
Judgment determines whether the direction is correct.
Progress is determined almost entirely at the judgment level.
Execution Is Compliance, Not Evaluation
Execution does not require judgment.
It requires compliance with a decided direction.
Once a direction is set, execution asks:
“How do we carry this out?”
It does not ask:
- Is this the right variable to change?
- Is this where the real constraint lives?
- What breaks if we succeed at this task?
When direction is wrong, execution does not resist it. It amplifies it.
How Teams Fix the Wrong Thing (A Common Failure Cascade)
Consider a familiar sequence.
Margins are tight.
A decision is made:
“The product costs too much.” Execution responds:
- reduce ingredient quality
- reformulate to cheaper inputs
- adjust processing parameters
The product now tastes worse.
Sales slow.
Another decision is made: “Marketing isn’t working.” Execution responds again:
- increase ad spend
- run promotions
- push distribution
The product still does not move.
What actually happened?
The wrong variable was adjusted first.
Margins may not have been tight because of formulation. They may have been tight because of:
- distributor terms
- channel structure
- OEM pricing power
- unrealistic volume assumptions
Judgment would have identified this earlier. Execution cannot diagnose causality.
Why Judgment Is a Higher Thinking Grade
Judgment does not ask: “What can we change?”
It asks:
“What should be changed — and why?”
Judgment narrows action by identifying:
- the true constraint
- the dominant variable
- the decision that created the exposure
Execution changes things.
Judgment decides where change actually matters.
Without judgment, teams adjust what is easiest to touch — often the product itself — even when the product was never the problem.
Where Failure Is Usually Locked In
Most food and beverage failures are decided before factories, branding, or distribution are involved. They are locked in when:
- Positioning is chosen without margin reality
- Formulation direction ignores manufacturability constraints
- Shelf life is treated as a technical issue rather than a commercial signal
- Scale assumptions are accepted without understanding cost inflection points
- “We’ll fix it later” becomes a governing logic Once execution begins, these decisions harden. Optionality collapses.
Stopping becomes expensive. Changing direction becomes political.
Execution does not cause these failures. It exposes them.
Taste Is a Requirement, Not the Constraint
Taste is table stakes.
If a product tastes bad, it fails immediately.
But most products that taste good still fail.
Because taste is rarely the constraint.
The real constraints usually sit elsewhere:
- cost structure at scale
- shelf-life vs channel reality
- pricing vs perceived value
- operational economics
Execution improves taste.
Judgment determines whether taste survives reality.
Optimising taste without identifying the real constraint creates motion without progress.
Why Execution Feels Like Progress
Execution produces visible activity.
People feel useful.
Time feels productive.
Momentum feels earned.
This creates emotional reinforcement.
But feeling productive is not the same as making progress.
Feelings are internal and unstable.
Progress is structural and directional.
Execution produces reassurance. Judgment produces movement.
When Compliance Scales, It Becomes a Trend
Execution follows direction.
When direction is inherited rather than judged — copied from competitors, justified by reports, validated by popularity — execution spreads it quickly.
At scale, this behaviour becomes a trend.
A trend is often nothing more than mass compliance with a direction that few people have independently judged under their own constraints.
Execution follows trends easily. Judgment rarely does.
Progress Happens Before Execution Begins
Real progress occurs before work compounds commitment.
It happens when:
- assumptions are made explicit
- constraints are identified
- reversibility is assessed
- dead paths are eliminated early
This work is invisible.
It produces no artefacts.
It does not feel productive.
But it prevents failure cascades later.
Execution Must Be Governed, Not Celebrated
Execution is necessary.
But without judgment:
- it fixes symptoms
- it defends bad decisions
- it compounds misalignment
Progress requires execution to be subordinate to judgment, not mistaken for it.
Decision Implication
If execution were progress, more work would produce better outcomes.
The opposite is often true.
This means progress is determined at a higher level — where judgment identifies what should not be done before execution makes it irreversible.
Related Insights:
Related Pages: